Link: How Wikipedia is fighting AI slop content

Wikipedia editors are combatting the surge of AI-generated content that is often filled with inaccuracies and fabricated citations. This has led to the implementation of new rules like "speedy deletion" to efficiently discard poorly crafted submissions.

Marshall Miller from the Wikimedia Foundation describes the editor community's response to this influx as an adaptive "immune system," continuously evolving to maintain the site's reliability and neutrality. The proactive stance includes the quick removal of articles that clearly haven't been human-reviewed.

Signs of AI authorship being targeted include user-directed writing, nonsensical citations, and non-existent references. Speedy deletion also applies to content deemed harassing, overly promotional, or simply incoherent.

The Wikimedia Foundation is exploring ways to use AI responsibly, aiming to enhance the quality of content and assist volunteers with cumbersome tasks. Thus, AI could be a tool for growth and efficiency if applied correctly and in concert with human oversight.

Additionally, new tools like "Edit Check" are being developed to help new contributors adhere to Wikipedia's strict publishing criteria. These tools are intended to lessen the burden of both editors and automated systems in verifying content authenticity.

The overarching strategy includes engaging the community in ongoing refinement of AI usage within Wikipedia's ecosystem to ensure content quality and accuracy. Meanwhile, the Wikimedia Foundation carefully moderates the balance between AI advantages and the challenges they present.

 #

--

Yoooo, this is a quick note on a link that made me go, WTF? Find all past links here.